California's SB 53, an AI safety and transparency bill, demonstrates that state regulation can coexist with AI progress, according to Adam Billen of Encode AI.
SB 53 mandates that large AI labs be transparent about their safety and security protocols, particularly regarding the prevention of catastrophic risks like cyber attacks and bio-weapons development. Companies are expected to adhere to these protocols, with enforcement by the Office of Emergency Services.
Billen argues that this law reinforces existing safety practices, preventing companies from cutting corners under competitive pressure, as some AI firms might relax safety standards to compete.
While there was less opposition to SB 53 compared to its predecessor, concerns remain in Silicon Valley about AI regulation hindering U.S. competitiveness against China. There are also efforts to preempt state AI laws through federal measures, such as Senator Ted Cruz's SANDBOX Act.
Billen emphasizes that state bills like SB 53, which address issues like deepfakes, algorithmic discrimination, and children's safety, are essential and don't impede U.S. competitiveness. He suggests focusing on measures like export controls to address concerns about the AI race with China.
He concludes that SB 53 exemplifies democracy in action, where industry and policymakers collaborate to create agreeable legislation.